Graphic Queen wrote:

> >That's curious because a recent report says that the survivor claims that one
> >of the victims did fire, but that he shot after the trespasser shot first.
> >
> Well, it wouldn't be the first time an accused person lied! I have no
> idea since I wasn't there, but I heard the last news report they had
> here said that the rifle hadn't been shot. I am sure that the cops
> there would check to see if the rifle had been fired. Doesn't take a
> college education to figure that one out. I suppose we will hear more
> later after the police have done their investigation.

Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the wounded told
police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but after he shot at them. I
agree that it wouldn't be the first time that an accused person lied. Nor would it
be the first time that a witness would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the
first time that a news source lied, especially FOX.