The Wolf wrote:

>
> > Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the wounded
> > told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but after he shot
> > at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that an accused person
> > lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness would lie. For that
> > matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news source lied, especially
> > FOX.
>
> I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
> read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?

Then you must watch FOX news because they were the source of whining about
having to wait to have their licence approved and they lied about that. I won't
bother arguing facts with you on that one but you are welcome to research it on
the net. See what FOX said about it and then see what really happened. Most
people hear aren't much interested in FOX, nor do they consider it to be a
reliable source for news.