Dave Smith > wrote:

> Graphic Queen wrote:
>
> > >That's curious because a recent report says that the survivor claims
> > that one >of the victims did fire, but that he shot after the trespasser
> > shot first. > Well, it wouldn't be the first time an accused person
> > lied! I have no idea since I wasn't there, but I heard the last news
> > report they had here said that the rifle hadn't been shot. I am sure
> > that the cops there would check to see if the rifle had been fired.
> > Doesn't take a college education to figure that one out. I suppose we
> > will hear more later after the police have done their investigation.
>
> Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the wounded
> told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but after he shot
> at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that an accused person
> lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness would lie. For that
> matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news source lied, especially
> FOX.

I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?