Basically, I question their going into a vegan group and trying to
disrupt it; It's called trolling. Reasonable questions are of course
welcome. Writing I should die doesn't encourage further reading.


Reynard wrote:

> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 20:56:28 GMT, "rick etter" > wrote:
>
>>"Reynard" > wrote in message ...
>>
>>>On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 19:58:57 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Rick's offered plenty of evidence over the years and it's never
>>>>received well by vegans and animal rights activists.
>>>
>>>Of course it won't be, because while continually ranting on
>>>at vegans for the supposed collateral deaths surrounding
>>>the foods they eat, he denies the collateral deaths associated
>>>with the production of his own, and this makes him the most
>>>vile hypocrite on these animal related forums.
>>
>>=================
>>Nope.
>
>
> It's true, Rick, and your quotes regarding grass fed beef
> confirm it. Look again at your reply to the comment below
> made by "ipse dixit". You do deny the existence of collateral
> deaths associated in the production of grass fed beef, and
> yet you have the gall to insist that it's the vegans here who
> deny the existence of collateral deaths associated with their
> foods. You're a lying hypocrite.
>
>
>>>[start ipse dixit to Rick Etter]
>>>
>>>>Then tell me how many collateral deaths are associated
>>>>with the grass fed beef you eat. After that tell me if you
>>>>accept that the *general* production, storage, and
>>>>distribution of grass fed beef accumulates any collateral
>>>>deaths.
>>>
>>>============================
>>>Why? The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period.
>>>[end]
>>>Rick Etter http://tinyurl.com/58l8m
>>>
>>>"The production of the beef I eat causes no CDs."
>>>"The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period."
>>>Rick Etter 2003-11-15
>>>
>>>He lies about the production of his beef and then goes on to
>>>insist that it's the vegans who lie about their food items. He's
>>>just a lying meatarian on a vegan forum. That's all. A troll.
>>
>>======================
>>Nope
>
>
> You can't escape those quotes you wrote, liar.