"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message
...
> Has a fun 'Jump to a Randon Link' button.
> "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Scented Nectar wrote:
>> > He keeps losing the fact that grass fed game
>>
>> Or beef, bison, goat, other wild game (rabbits, squirrels, gator,
> etc.),
>> and fish...
>>
>> > must be compared to veganic (I like that new
>> > word!) farming,
>>
>> It's not a word. And the irony is you're the one who invoked "peaceful
>> harvests" and wanted to compare it to feedlot-based grain-fed beef.
>
> Ok, how about your 'scrub beef'. Veganic still wins hands down.
> =================
Not your diet, fool. We aren't discussing mythical foods, we're talking
about real foods that you and I and Usual all buy. The fact that *you*
have to resort to a diet that is not available says your diet as it now
stands loses, and that you know you cannot defend it.


>> > and when compared, the
>> > veganic wins as far as cds go.
>>
>> No, it doesn't. You and Rick live reasonably near each other, and make
>> for a good real-world contrast in different diets and philosophies.
>>
>> Your "vegan" diet relies on commercially-grown foods, all of which
>> result in CDs. Your "vegan" diet includes machine-harvested rice which
>> results in CDs. Your "vegan" diet includes tropical foods shipped in
>> from far away, which also results in CDs.
>>
>> Rick's diet is locally-produced and much less dependent on machine
>> harvesting. As a result, his food results in fewer CDs than yours. If
>> the counting game determines who's more ethical, Rick beats you easily
>> because you've already lost the moment you start counting.
>
> As I understand it, veganic uses compassionate harvesting
> An ideal diet is from such practices. 0 cds.
======================
No. Any production on the scale it would mean to support people will
require machinery, and the necessary petro-chemical industry. Plus, *ALL*
crop land is environmental destruction.


>
>> > I'm in more of a current position to buy organic than to
>> > grow it myself,
>>
>> AHA. We finally get to your reality rather than your rhetoric. I
> suppose
>> it's pretty easy to talk of "peaceful harvests" when you don't
> actually
>> have one.
>
> The organic farms that supply my area are pretty good.
======================
Why do you try to resort to this ly? Organic does not mean cruelty-free or
pesticide-free. Haven't you read anything I've posted for you? You really
wish to remain terminally ignorant, don;t you killer? So much for your
stated claim as to wanting to reduce your impact, hypocrite.


>
>> > but idealy I think it would be great to have
>> > a couple acres and grow most of the food needed.
>>
>> ALL your little food fantasies are Utopian delusions. You don't live
> in
>> an ideal world, you live in THIS one. Lay off the dope for a while so
>> you can afford to buy or lease land and see if you can live up to all
>> the sanctimonious, self-righteous bullshit you peddle. Until then,
>> Skanky, practice what you preach.
>
> Not delusions. More and more people are turning back to
> non-harmful, small scale farming.
================
Except you. But again, it is not 'non-harmful.'


>
>
> SN
> http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
> A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
> Irony, stupidity and ignorance on display!!!
>