View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Bob (this one)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mirek F=EDdler wrote:

>>>But that is not number of responders.

>>
>>The number of responders is a dynamic one.
>>
>>>But I am sure that you will rather
>>>find any way how to answer this question without giving the number (th=

at=20
>>>is
>>>correct answer).

>>
>>The effectiveness of the 2PD Approach is measured by the percentage of
>>folks who respond. As long as the number of non-responders is 0 (zero)=

,
>>the percentage will remain 100% no matter how large the number of
>>responders grows. As far as I know, there is no other diet or diet
>>approach that can make the claim of being 100% effective for bringing
>>about weight loss. Moreover, 100% of those who have been using the 2PD=


>>Approach for more than 5 years are lighter than their *before* weight
>>(i.e. none of these veteran 2PDers are heavier). So yes, the 2PD
>>Approach is now one way to "cure" obesity.

>=20
> Yes, I knew it. No number, just fuzzy talk we are already used to.


Part of it is because the 2PD isn't more than 5 years old. Chung=20
claims there are people who have been doing it for more than that.

Bob

> No problem, I did not hold my breath. I know you very well already... :=

)
>=20
> Mirek=20