View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)   Report Post  
URAQT2
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Must you cross post this crap into alt.support.diabetes?
We don't want it.
Take outside, as the bartender said.

Bob (this one) wrote:

> Mirek Fídler wrote:
>
>>>> But that is not number of responders.
>>>
>>>
>>> The number of responders is a dynamic one.
>>>
>>>> But I am sure that you will rather
>>>> find any way how to answer this question without giving the number
>>>> (that is
>>>> correct answer).
>>>
>>>
>>> The effectiveness of the 2PD Approach is measured by the percentage of
>>> folks who respond. As long as the number of non-responders is 0 (zero),
>>> the percentage will remain 100% no matter how large the number of
>>> responders grows. As far as I know, there is no other diet or diet
>>> approach that can make the claim of being 100% effective for bringing
>>> about weight loss. Moreover, 100% of those who have been using the 2PD
>>> Approach for more than 5 years are lighter than their *before* weight
>>> (i.e. none of these veteran 2PDers are heavier). So yes, the 2PD
>>> Approach is now one way to "cure" obesity.

>>
>>
>> Yes, I knew it. No number, just fuzzy talk we are already used to.

>
>
> Part of it is because the 2PD isn't more than 5 years old. Chung claims
> there are people who have been doing it for more than that.
>
> Bob
>
>> No problem, I did not hold my breath. I know you very well already...
>>
>> Mirek

>
>