Retard wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:58:50 GMT, Jay Santos > wrote:
>
>>Retard wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:49:26 GMT, Jay Santos > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Even if I were Plato, I couldn't have designed a more
>>>>excellent foil than "Scented Nectar" to illustrate the
>>>>ethical bankruptcy of "veganism", and the moral
>>>>confusion from which it originates.
>>>>
>>>>Undeniably, she began by believing that merely by not
>>>>consuming animal parts, she was causing zero harm to
>>>
>>>... farmed
>>
>>No.
>
>
> Yes

No. The classic "vegan" fallacy is that they cause
zero harm to ANY animals. They all begin by believing
this; the twit pothead is just the most recent to make
it publicly.

>
>
>>>>animals. This belief IS the classic "vegan" Denying
>>>>the Antecedent fallacy:
>>>>
>>>> If I eat meat, I cause animals to suffer and die.
>
>
> This conditional proposition is

True.