View Single Post
  #99 (permalink)   Report Post  
Ron
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com>,
"Jay Santos" > wrote:

> Ron wrote:
> > In article t>,
> > Jay Santos > wrote:
> >
> > > Ron wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article t>,
> > > > Jay Santos > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Ron wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>In article t>,
> > > >>> Jay Santos > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>Ron wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>In article

> . net>,
> > > >>>>>Jay Santos > wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>In article

> .net>,
> > > >>>>>>>Jay Santos > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>In article

> et>,
> > > >>>>>>>>>Jay Santos > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>Sophomore Ron wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>That you equate veganism and forced sexual violence
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>I asked you to respond with a yes or a no, sophomoric
> > > >>>>>>>>>>shitbag. "Yes or no, Sophomore Ron - dispense with
> > > >>>>>>>>>>your usual blowhard windy equivocation."
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>Answer the question, Sophomore Ron, and answer it with
> > > >>>>>>>>>>a yes or a no: Do you believe sodomizing small
> > > >>>>>>>>>>children with broom handles to be morally wrong? Yes
> > > >>>>>>>>>>or no, shitbag; no one is interested in your sophistry.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>Do you?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>Answer the question, shitbag. Do you believe
> > > >>>>>>>>sodomizing small children with broom handles to be
> > > >>>>>>>>morally wrong?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>Answer yes or no, shitbag. No one is interested in
> > > >>>>>>>>reading yet more of your trite sophistry.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>We both must think it okay.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>No, don't speak for me, cocksucker.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>Anyway, I'll take that as a "Yes, cocksucker Ron
> > > >>>>>>believe it to be morally wrong for adults to sodomize
> > > >>>>>>children", although given your sexual orientation, I'm
> > > >>>>>>not sure I believe you. Anyway, what took you so long
> > > >>>>>>to answer, cocksucker?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>Since we have time to discuss anything here.
> > > >>>>>>>Since neither of us is championing the poor broomed

> children, we must
> > > >>>>>>>not view it as objectively or absolutely wrong.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>****wit - I'm not talking about what others might do to
> > > >>>>>>stop psychopath degenerates like you from sodomizing
> > > >>>>>>children. That isn't the issue, and my belief that it
> > > >>>>>>is absolutely wrong does not compel me to try to stop
> > > >>>>>>you from doing it. It DOES allow me to declare you
> > > >>>>>>evil for doing it.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>The point in asking the question, cocksucker, is to get
> > > >>>>>>Skanky Carpetmuncher and you to see that if YOU believe
> > > >>>>>>it is absolutely wrong, then YOU must not do it at all.
> > > >>>>>>It isn't about me preventing you from doing
> > > >>>>>>something, cocksucker; it's about YOU recognizing what
> > > >>>>>>your belief in moral absolutes necessarily dictates to
> > > >>>>>>YOU about YOUR behavior.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>You don't have the power to stop me from doing anything.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>That's probably false, but beside the point. It isn't
> > > >>>>my personal and direct obligation to stop you from
> > > >>>>committing evil acts.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Nor is it the vegan's responsibility to stop others from killing

> animals
> > > >>>-- if we accept your reasoning.
> > > >>
> > > >>I never suggested it was, homo. I said it is the
> > > >>"vegan's" responsibility not to participate in the
> > > >>process, in any way, that leads to killing animals.
> > > >>Buying from a producer who you know kills animals is
> > > >>participating. You can't believe the killing of
> > > >>animals is wrong and participate in the process.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Of course, she can.
> > >
> > > No, she can't. To participate means one doesn't really
> > > believe it's wrong.

> >
> > I clearly articulated the difficulty with this position

>
> No, you didn't demonstrate any difficulty at all with the position,
> Brucie. Run along now.


Sore losers, are such a tragedy.

Tofu for everyone, it's on me.