"Ron" > wrote
[..]

>> > The vegan mitigates their responsibility by following all the rules and
>> > the laws associated with killing animals.
>>
>> There are no rules and laws associated with killing animals, no such law
>> is
>> even feasible. Vegans have fabricated a morality outside the normal one,
>> with moral rules involving animals that go far beyond it, yet they live
>> in
>> the comfort and protection of the normal moral system with it's cheap
>> affordable food and health care. If they are going to preach an
>> outlandish
>> moral system and preach to me that I ought to follow it, they need to
>> follow
>> it first. Cutting down on animal products is not nearly enough to
>> validate
>> their alleged moral system.
>
> "Normal moral system?" What's that about. I was taught to eat meat and I
> was taught which meats were acceptable and socially acceptable eat.

Customs.

> Of course, your argument has been disputed and your simply ignored the
> formations that clearly demonstrated the double standard that you
> applied to the vegan.

Not at all, you have utterly misconstrued the arguments all along the way.

>> > Come on, Dutch. You lost.
>>
>> Phaw.. in your dreams. Wake up!
>
> I clearly demonstrated this. When your own logic was presented with a
> different example, you simply commented that you didn't have the time to
> do all that was necessary to follow through.

Your examples were nothing but a convoluted mess based on fallacies. I do
not have the time to completely untangle your mixed-up thinking, you must do
some of the work yourself.

If you would learn to listen, instead of playing devil's advocate on every
point to attempt to "score", you might get somewhere. Playing devil's
advocate is exactly as valid as agreeing with everything you read.


[..]