On 12/23/2003 11:29 PM, in article
, "Ken Davey"
> opined:

> alzelt wrote:
>> Ken Davey wrote:
>>
>>> Michel Boucher wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Rona Yuthasastrakosol" > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess Canada now has a reason to reciprocate the last few
>>>>>> months in (no-)beef trade :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So far, it's being reported that Canada is taking the high
>>>>> road--"Now is not the time for tit-for-tat" or something like
>>>>> that. Personally, I think Canada should ban US beef imports. Why
>>>>> the hell not?
>>>>
>>>> Canadian consumer annoyance with US uppityism might force the issue.
>>>> Or, we might make a trade...we'll take their beef if they leave our
>>>> softwood lumber alone :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ya mean we might actually have a bargaining chip?
>>> Haha, yuk yuk. Not bloody likely. Watch how this gets minimized and
>>> called 'not of any importance' in the overall scheme of things'.
>>> Does 'level playing field' ring a bell?
>>> Ken (a Canadian watching my friends lose their jobs and their homes
>>> to American 'special interest' protectionism)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> In Wa. State, as many people working in mills are out of work as in
>> Canada. When U.S. imports logs, it costs a lot more than buying
>> finished products.
> Funny thing - we (in Canada - specifically the west coast) detest the export
> of raw logs for the same reason as you decry their import. Corporate
> interests dictate what happens - not the needs of ordinary people. Time for
> a revolt methinks.
> Ken.
>
>
>
You capitalist pigs! Where did you learn that from?
--
================================================== =======================
In the world of advertising there¹s no such thing as a lie, there¹s only
the expedient exaggeration.
================================================== =======================