In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:
> "Ron" > wrote
>
> >> >>In the process, she has revealed the fatal flaw in
> >> >>"veganism" and, necessarily, in "vegans" themselves:
> >> >>they don't really believe their absolute claim that
> >> >>killing animals is wrong. Once that claim is
> >> >>effectively abandoned, as this reveals it must be, we
> >> >>see that "veganism" isn't about ethics at all.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You are putting forth a very contrived logical position.
> >>
> >> No, it isn't. It's a very well reasoned position, one
> >> that is essentially accepted even by most "vegans".
> >
> > Ah, we return to an argument must be right because it common or popular.
> > So much for "great minds".
>
> He didn't argue that the logic was right *because* it was essentially
> accepted by most vegans, he said it was logical based on it's own merits,
> *and* essentially accepted by most vegans.
>
> Ron, honestly, your comprehension skills are sadly lacking.
"Essentially argued even by most...." is exactly what he wrote.
|