"Abner Hale" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Scented Nectar wrote:
>> > > There's still the fact that vegan foods as a whole
>> > > cause less cds than animal products as a whole.
>> > > That's something you can't dispute. Organic or
>> > > not.
>> >
>> > I'm disputing it. It's your assertion; prove it.
>>
>> Do you dispute that the animal product industry
>> as a whole uses more crops and thus has more
>> cds than plant foods grown for human consumption
>> as a whole?
>
> Maybe. Maybe not. Grass-fed beef doesn't. Besides, who said anything
> about animal industry?
>
>> Animals need way more crops to
>> produce a pound of meat than for a pound of
>> vegan food. Pigs, poultry, you name it, it takes
>> more crops to feed them.
>
> Grass-fed beef doesn't. Hunted venison doesn't.
>
>>
>> Anyways, if you're so concerned about cds,
>> then do something about it. I've done my
>> bit, like it or leave it.
>
> I'm not. I don't think there's anything ethically wrong with animals
> dying so I can eat; that's just the way nature works. My point is, you
> haven't "done your bit." You haven't really done anything.
>
> It's as plain as the nose on your face that some meats come at a lower
> cd cost than some veggies.
=====================
She has already proven she doesn't care. She even knows that different
veggies come with different amounts of CDs. She cares nothing about
changing her diet to reflect that knowledge. Her religion demands only that
she follows a simple rule for her simple mind, and that's all she hangs
onto.


You don't care. It's not about cd's, it's
> not about animals. It's about something you can do that makes you
> THINK you're doing something, when the effort doesn't really amount to
> anything. Especially not any real critical thinking on your part.
==================
Too drugged out apparently to do any critical thinking. Maybe *any* thinking
at all.
>