Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > I guess you don't get it. Two of the groups you're
> > > crossposting to here specifically don't eat dead
> > > bodies, regardless of what you might think of that.
> >
> > I don't care one way or another what you eat. But I enjoy pointing
> out
> > that your stated reasons for doing so are intellectualy slovenly
and
> > phony.
>
> The reasons are all quite valid. Health, animal welfare,
> aesthetics, religion, allergies, trend following, etc.

"Trend following?" WTF?

> These are some of the many reasons people
> become vegetarian. You are no one when it comes
> to pointing out that my reasons are [insult, insult, etc].
> You have no credibility with me because of the
> insulting manner you present yourself in here.

I'm right. You know it. I know it.

>
> > > It's kind of silly to suggest that a vegetarian eat
> > > meat.
> >
> > Have I?
>
> Yes. You quite highly recommended it for me, if I'm
> remembering correctly.

No, dummy. I pointed out that some meats come at a lower CD cost than
some veggies, and that you don't care.

>
> > > Especially when their primary reason
> > > is health.
> >
> > We've seen that your primary reason is "it's icky." Not health.
>
> It's health and animals and aesthetics all rolled into one
> and all fixed by my dietary choice.

The health reasons are phony. It's perfectly possible to have a
wonderfully healthy diet that includes meat in various forms. You KNOW
that's true. The "animal" reasons are phony. You COULD do more to
reduce CDs, but you don't, because it would be INCONVENIENT. The ONLY
valid reason you've given boils down to "meat is icky."

All that pot has messed up your thinking.

>
> > > But I believe that we are
> > > meant to be vegetarian. You're free to believe
> > > differently, just don't push your beliefs on me.
> >
> > So what? You have NO expertise in that area.
>
> And I'm supposed to throw away my years of what
> I've learned and take the word of an insulting troll???
> LOL

You have learned nothing. You've read a few lurid, hysterical web
sites written by activists, not scientists. You have NEVER sought to
learn, only to confirm your prejudices.

>
> > > > > If all meat eaters turned to hunted meat and grass
> > > > > fed beef, the hunted would become extinct. The
> > > > > demand for meat is too high. Also, there would
> > > > > be people still demanding pork and poultry.
> > > >
> > > > There's enough for YOU. What's YOUR excuse?
>
> See you're recommending it to me again. Pushing it
> like a bad drug on me.

No, just pointing out that it's not at all 'about the animals.' You're
a fraud.

>
> > > > And NONE of your "vegan alternatives" have 0 deaths. NONE.
> > > > You ARE a hypocrite, a moral shirker of the worst sort.
> > >
> > > When I've eaten stuff grown in friend's gardens, there are 0
> > > deaths.
> >
> > What's that, one percent of your diet?
>
> Depends on the time of year, and who's growing
> what.

One percent, or less. I'd bet money on it.

>
> > Fact is, you COULD do more, but you don't. You're a phony.
>
> Fact is, it's only the trolls like you who can't accept that people
> are not going to live up to your ideals for us of perfection.

Fact is, you don't even ATTEMPT to live up to YOUR OWN STATED ETHIC.
You're a filthy hypocrite.

>
> It's you trolls who say that being vegan means we have to
> become superheroes and save the world of cds in our lives.
> You say it's OUR expectation of ourselves but that's a lie.
> It's YOUR expectation for the sole purpose of being able
> to whine "you're not doing all you can".

No, stupid, we just point out that your expectations are stupid, your
claims fraudulent, and that you are not only a hypocrite but a sloppy,
weak thinker. And you make it so EASY!