Scented Nectar wrote:
> "Retard" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:25:27 -0500, "Scented Nectar"
>
> > wrote:
>
>>>Why a month ago, what's different now? I gave up
>>>meat in 1981. Recently I've begun eliminating the
>>>last of the dairy in my meals, so if it's that you're
>>>talking about, I haven't kept records and can't
>>>therefore answer you.
>>
>>It's a bit like making a new year's resolution to stop
>>dropping litter. Even though you had no idea of the
>>amount of litter you were dropping in 2004, holding
>>on to your litter and disposing of it properly in 2005
>>will mean you have reduced your littering, however
>>much littering you did prior to 2005. You don't need
>>numbers to know you're reducing your litter, and the
>>same goes for collateral deaths, so don't let the likes
>>of 'usual suspect' tell you any different while he tries
>>to belittle and dismiss your efforts.
>
> I see through him.
No, you avoid dealing with facts whether they're presented by me, Rick,
Jay, Dutch, or anyone else. You're a true believer: you will not deviate
from the vegan religion.
> He doesn't get basic concepts,
I do get "basic concepts," which is why I don't walk the line promoting
a flawed belief system like veganism.
> so there's no way of getting more complex in
> conversation with him.
You can't even support your own claims with any evidence, much less
address the evidence I've brought up in our discussions.
> One has to repeat things
No, all you have to do is stop tap dancing and deal with facts rather
than making up "logic" -- which isn't logic at all -- and repeating it
over and over.
> that he should have already understood from
> previous paragraphs/postings. Oh well.
You've done NOTHING to support your claims, aside from repeating them.
That's called tautology. It's NOT proof, it demonstrates a lack of it.
> Your comparison to littering is a good one.
It was a pathetic one.
> At least YOU get the concept!
He doesn't get it, and neither do you, which is why you two fellow
travelers see eye to eye on the matter. It's funny that you're siding
with the biggest shit-stirrer in the history of these newsgroups, whose
background is in woodworking and auto electrics (don't get me started on
British electrical systems!), not in any academic background. Indeed,
he's openly demonstrated contempt for those with academic backgrounds:
You college types have no natural awareness of what's going on
around you, sometimes.
-- Dreck, Claire's uncle,
http://tinyurl.com/54zxm
Birds of a feather...