Retard wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:01:12 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>
>>Retard wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:56:53 -0500, "Scented Nectar" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Retard" .****> wrote in message ...
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:25:27 -0500, "Scented Nectar" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Why a month ago, what's different now? I gave up
>>>>>>meat in 1981. Recently I've begun eliminating the
>>>>>>last of the dairy in my meals, so if it's that you're
>>>>>>talking about, I haven't kept records and can't
>>>>>>therefore answer you.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's a bit like making a new year's resolution to stop
>>>>>dropping litter. Even though you had no idea of the
>>>>>amount of litter you were dropping in 2004, holding
>>>>>on to your litter and disposing of it properly in 2005
>>>>>will mean you have reduced your littering, however
>>>>>much littering you did prior to 2005. You don't need
>>>>>numbers to know you're reducing your litter, and the
>>>>>same goes for collateral deaths, so don't let the likes
>>>>>of 'usual suspect' tell you any different while he tries
>>>>>to belittle and dismiss your efforts.
>>>>
>>>>I see through him.
>>>
>>>We all do. Since turning his back on veganism he's
>>>become a meat pusher like all the other meat pushers
>>>we get here on this forum.
>>
>>I've recommended that people consume products which
>
> ... they don't want,

They don't want to actually do what they say they're doing -- saving
animals though their consumption still kills them. They're content with
their hypocrisy.

> you attack them and belittle their efforts at staying 'clean.'

They're not clean, they're hypocrites.

>>>They're no better or worse
>>>than drug pushers, in my opinion,
>>
>>So says the

Un
> clean

fat ****

> who doesn't

practice what he preaches.

>>>their product onto non-users in the very same way with
>>
>>What a terrible analogy
>
> It's a perfect

**** up.