In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote
> > "Dutch" > wrote:
>
> >> > More diversion. We were discussing pot use. I'll disengage if you are
> >> > refusing to address the issues that were raised.
> >>
> >> You're not discussing issues, issues are irrelevant to your trolling.
> >> Your
> >> ego is bruised and since you can't compete on reason you're attempting to
> >> even the score using brute force. You think if you shovel it thick and
> >> deep
> >> enough your antagonists will eventually succumb through sheer exhaustion.
> >>
> >> You're a featherweight with a supersize shovel.
> >
> > I offered to discussed several issues including reviewing the Baltimore
> > study that you offered as evidence to support your claims. Whose shovel
> > are we discussing?
>
> You have NOT attempted to "discuss" anything, your knee jerks, then you make
> some nonsensical objection, sometimes piling some totally useless rhetoric
> on top of it. Until you wise up, you're a joke, a fluffball. Unless you are
> actually a troll as I thought, then you're pretty good.

I'll take that as a "no". It seems despite cutting and pasting that
information that you are unwilling to defend it as accurate.