"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message
...
>> > So, if the transportation industry, both national and international,
>> > causes animal deaths, then are you suggesting that vegans
>> > give up their clothing, tvs, mattresses, stoves, etc.?
>> ===========================
>> If you truly believed in what you spew, then yes. Your problem is
> that you
>> don't even try to reduce your impact. In fact, you have made a point
> of
>> acknowledging the fact that you go out of your way to ensure that you
> use
>> imported products. Quite compassionate of you, eh hypocrite?
>
> Well, I for one am not willing to give up all machinery
> and clothes (I'd get arrested!). Why do you call it MY
> spew, when it's you trolls who keep bringing up your
> cd expectations of us.
====================
Because *you* are the one that keeps making claims that *you* cannot
back-up, killer. Show us the results of your extensive research, hypocite,
and put the matter to restforever.


>
>> > You certainly have some overly high expectations of
>> > what you think vegans should do. It's funny that it's
>> > the non-vegan, insulting trolls that have ridiculous
>> > expectations.
>> ====================
>> LOL They aren't *my* expectations fool. They are your own words of
> spewing
>> that *YOU* care about animals when all you really do is follow the
> simple
>> rule for your simple mind that your religion demands of you.
> Obviously you
>> care nothing about your own contributions to unnecessary animal death
> and
>> suffering.
>
> My 'simple' rule of not eating animal products is first and
> foremost for health reasons.
==========================
Then you're wrong again. But that's not news, is it?


I know that I've also happened
> to reduce cds in my dietary change and that makes me
> happy too.
======================
The same unfounded claim that you cannot, and never will back-up with any
data.


Stop demanding that vegans eliminate ALL
> cds everywhere.
==================
LOL I'm only suggesting that you at least live up to *SOME* of the
so-called beliefs you spew, killer. As it is, all you manage to prove is
that you care nothing about killing animals willy-nilly for nothing more
than your selfishness and entertainment.


That's impossible in todays world.
> I'm content with the dent I've made. Don't demand that
> it be bigger. It's not up to you.
=================
LOL I never claimed it was, fool. You made the claim that it mattered!
You are the one lacking the real results from your so-called beliefs.
Instead, all you follow is your simple rule for your simple mind.


>
>> > No, an owl is a hoot. Food storage by rodents
>> > is a well known fact.
>> ======================
>> Yeah fool, they take the poisons they are deliberate fed back to their
> nests
>> while their guts turn to mush over a few days. How is that
> compassionate,
>> killer?
>
> On commercial farms, where most crops go for use as
> fodder, that's true. But on organic farms, that's not true.
================
BS, liar. Back up your ignorance, fool!
Besides, your food comes from the massive factory-farms you keep talking
about, killer.


>
>> > Nonsense. There are b12 supplements if one's
>> > intestinal flora aren't producing and absorbing it.
>> ====================
>> You don't absorb your own b12, fool. So much for all the research
> you've
>> claimed to have done. And then there is the suppliments. Back to
> depending
>> on the petro-chemical industry again, I see. Are you a shill for big
>> industry? How much of a cut do you get for promoting all this extra
> killing
>> you propose, hypocrite?
>
> I'd still rather take the bacterially grown (not petro) b12 supplements.
> I forget the brand name, but I saved the message somewhere.
==================
All grown with inputs from the petro-chemical industry. How much do you get
paid, ahill?

>
>> >> >> > That's funny, I've been to very few 'activist' websites. I do
>> >> >> > however go to and subscribe to, many science news sites.
>> >> >> =======================
>> >> >> LOL Then why are they on your site with links? Anything that
>> >> > proclaims
>> >> >> that something is the greatest thing since sliced bread, and
> then
>> >> > m,akes no
>> >> >> mention of the fact hat there are differing opinions is an
>> >> >> activist/propagand site looking to scam the rubes.
>> >> >
>> >> > On my recipe link site, I state clearly that all views, beliefs,
>> >> > etc are those of the people who made the various recipe
>> >> > sites. You will find activists, health nuts, food enthusiasts,
>> >> > specialty food sites, etc. I go to those websites for recipes.
>> >> > That's where my focus is. For scientific info, I go elsewhere.
>> >> ===============
>> >> Then you lied above, huh? You claimed you didn't go to 'activist'
>> > sites,
>> >> yet you link them from you page. What an ignorant dolt...
>> >
>> > I have been the activist's recipe sites. I go for the
>> > recipes. I don't hang around to join a cause, even
>> > though it's a good one.
>> ================
>> Then you did ly? You claimed you didn't go to them.
>
> I said I've been to very few. When I go to recipe sites from
> my listing, I'm there for the recipes. I hardly notice the other
> stuff there. I'm sure some sites are 'activist'. Some are
> religious, some promote health reasons, some just want
> to share their recipes. Doesn't matter. It's the recipes
> I read and list.
==================
And continue to prove the irony and hypocrisy of mainyaining the site to
begin with. I love you ignorance, it's so total.


>
>> >> >> > By admitting that hunting the deer would reverse their
>> >> >> > overpopulation, you admit that hunting them keeps
>> >> >> > lowering their amounts. After they are no longer
>> >> >> > overpopulated, when you keep hunting (the demand
>> >> >> > for meat doesn't go away you know) their numbers
>> >> >> > keep going down until they are extinct.
>> >> >> ==================
>> >> >> Clueless urbanite. You have no clue as to animals, do you
> killer?
>> >> >
>> >> > Try reading my paragraph again. Did you take any
>> >> > rudimentary mathematics when you were a kid?
>> >> ==================
>> >> Math has nothing to do with animal numbers fool. Deer are hunted
>> > now, and
>> >> guess what? Their numbers continue to rise, fool.
>> >
>> > Try increasing the hunt to replace all factory farmed
>> > meat. You'll see extinction soon enough.
>> ==================
>> Why? We are talking about what an individual could do to improve
> their
>> impact on animals and the environment, not the masses. Why is it you
> want
>> to compare apples and oranges when it comes to what can 'feed the
> world,'
>> fool?
>
> Why not talk about the masses?
==================
Because it's *YOU* that claims to want to make a difference. You can't
bring yourself to actually care enough to make the change, so you focus
instead on what you think others are doing and what they should do. That
doesn't really leave you off the hook like you think, hypocrite.


The reality is that
> the masses affect the world around us. What are
> the apples and oranges you're talking about? If
> ALL individuals took your advise, demand would
> exceed supply big time.
==================
No, it wouldn't fool. It's the reverse that is true for *your* advice.
Like I have told you, *all* beef cattle are already grass-fed for most of
their lives. Tha=ey are already on pasture that is alreasdy in place.
Man, you really are one willfully ignorant loon, killer.

>
>
>
>
> --
> SN
> http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
> A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
> Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.
>
>
>