On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:36:25 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>Reynard wrote:
>> On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:29:45 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:22:16 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:40:40 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>>>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:12:28 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:47:57 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:01:12 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:56:53 -0500, "Scented Nectar" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Reynard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:25:27 -0500, "Scented Nectar" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why a month ago, what's different now? I gave up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>meat in 1981. Recently I've begun eliminating the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>last of the dairy in my meals, so if it's that you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>talking about, I haven't kept records and can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>therefore answer you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's a bit like making a new year's resolution to stop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>dropping litter. Even though you had no idea of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>amount of litter you were dropping in 2004, holding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>on to your litter and disposing of it properly in 2005
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>will mean you have reduced your littering, however
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>much littering you did prior to 2005. You don't need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>numbers to know you're reducing your litter, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>same goes for collateral deaths, so don't let the likes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of 'usual suspect' tell you any different while he tries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to belittle and dismiss your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I see through him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>We all do. Since turning his back on veganism he's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>become a meat pusher like all the other meat pushers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>we get here on this forum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I've recommended that people consume products which
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>... they don't want,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>They don't want to actually do what they say they're doing
>>>>>>>>>>
>> <restore>
>> They are doing exactly what they say they're doing: abstaining
>> from meat, so stop pushing it onto them, pusher.

You didn't comment on this, pusher, but at least
you left it in this time.

>>>>you attack them and belittle their efforts at staying 'clean.'
>>>
>>>They're not clean, they're hypocrites.
>>
>> Spoken like the true
>
>You mean truth.

No I meant what you keep snipping away. I meant that
what you wrote was spoken like the true user you are,
trying to push your substances onto clean targets by
calling them hypocrites.

You are a pusher, and like any other pusher you'll lie to
your targets here to make it easier to push your unwanted
substances onto them.

It's a perfect analogy, pusher.

An analogy is written in the form.
A is like B.
B has property P.
Therefore, A has property P.

(A) A pusher pushing meat
is like
(B) A pusher pushing drugs
(B) has the property (P), a dependency for his product
and a desire to push it onto others.

Therefore, (A) a pusher pushing meat has the property
(P), a dependency for his product and a desire to push it
onto others.

Shove off, pusher!