Ron wrote:
> In article >, "Dutch"
>
> wrote:
>
> > Fudgepacker > wrote
> > > "Dutch" > wrote:
> > >
> > >> "Ron" > wrote
> > >>
> > >> > The question was who taught you that you or I was responsible
for the
> > >> > outcomes of other people's actions.
> > >>
> > >> It's called complicity. In legal jargon it's "accessory".
> > >
> > > And again, you avoided the question.
> > >
> > > Who taught the pharoahs that they were responsible for the
outcomes of
> > > other people's actions?
> >
> > Assuming that you're talking about actions in which you have
aideding or
> > abeted, since it's common sense, their fathers and mothers
probably.
>
> As I stated previously, it is consistent with the thinking of a child
to
> think that one is responsible for the outcome of other people's
actions.

If that's really what you stated, then you're an even more moronic
fudgepacker than previously thought, because that is COMPLETELY wrong.
As a fudgepacker, all you know about children is how to bugger the
boys.
Children think they're reponsible for NOTHING, you ignorant fat ****.