In article . com>,
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote:

> Ron wrote:
> > In article >, "Dutch"
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Fudgepacker > wrote
> > > > "Dutch" > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> "Ron" > wrote
> > > >>
> > > >> > The question was who taught you that you or I was responsible
> for the
> > > >> > outcomes of other people's actions.
> > > >>
> > > >> It's called complicity. In legal jargon it's "accessory".
> > > >
> > > > And again, you avoided the question.
> > > >
> > > > Who taught the pharoahs that they were responsible for the
> outcomes of
> > > > other people's actions?
> > >
> > > Assuming that you're talking about actions in which you have
> aideding or
> > > abeted, since it's common sense, their fathers and mothers
> probably.
> >
> > As I stated previously, it is consistent with the thinking of a child
> to
> > think that one is responsible for the outcome of other people's
> actions.
>
> If that's really what you stated, then you're an even more moronic
> fudgepacker than previously thought, because that is COMPLETELY wrong.
> As a fudgepacker, all you know about children is how to bugger the
> boys.
> Children think they're reponsible for NOTHING, you ignorant fat ****.

Fat? Ya might want to tone down the projection, sweetcheecks.