Ron wrote:
> In article .com>,
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
>
> > Ron wrote:
> > > In article
.com>,
> > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Fudgepacker wrote:
> > > > > In article >,
> > > > > usual suspect > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ron the pathetic little homo wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>Vegans are responsible for their own consumption and the
> > manner in which
> > > > > > >>their own food is produced.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > By what _moral_ principle are they responsible for the
manner
> > in which
> > > > > > > their food is produced?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Their own*. See their websites, you stupid fudgepacker.
Read
> > their
> > > >
> > > > > > literature. They claim to live cruelty-free lives and they
> > oppose
> > > > the
> > > > > > death of animals. Their consumption of
mechanically-harvested
> > > > foods,
> > > > > > transported and stored foods, etc., proves otherwise.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >>They have a variety of options -- including
> > > > > > >>growing their own food or paying farmers to grow in a
manner
> > > > consistent
> > > > > > >>with "vegan ethics" -- but they choose instead to operate
> > under
> > > > the
> > > > > > >>delusion that their diet is cruelty-free merely because
they
> > > > don't eat
> > > > > > >>meat. Their consumption is as slothful as your abhorrent
> > attempts
> > > > to use
> > > > > > >>logic, Ron.
> > > > >
> > > > > Which vegan killed what animal
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't matter. Their behavior rewards the farmer for
producing
> > > > food in a way that is lethal to animals. That's all you need
to
> > know.
> > >
> > > You are ignoring the question.
> >
> > Right: because it isn't a serious question. It's a weak attempt
at
> > sophistry.
> >
> > > Which vegan killed what animal.
> >
> > See above.
> >
> > >
> > > > The dead animals are not individually assignable to people, but
> > then,
> > > > you already knew that; your question was not a serious
question,
> > merely
> > > > sophistry.
> > >
> > > So then, we have dead animals with no identifiable killers
> >
> > No. Once again, you have deliberately misrepresented what was
written,
> > because you imagine yourself to be clever. Try again.
>
> Further editing and avoidance of the question.
The question is illegitimate, and posed in bad faith.