In article .com>,
"Rudy Canoza" > wrote:

> Ron wrote:
> > In article .com>,
> > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
> >
> > > Ron wrote:
> > > > In article
> .com>,
> > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Fudgepacker wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > usual suspect > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ron the pathetic little homo wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>Vegans are responsible for their own consumption and the
> > > manner in which
> > > > > > > >>their own food is produced.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > By what _moral_ principle are they responsible for the
> manner
> > > in which
> > > > > > > > their food is produced?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *Their own*. See their websites, you stupid fudgepacker.
> Read
> > > their
> > > > >
> > > > > > > literature. They claim to live cruelty-free lives and they
> > > oppose
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > death of animals. Their consumption of
> mechanically-harvested
> > > > > foods,
> > > > > > > transported and stored foods, etc., proves otherwise.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>They have a variety of options -- including
> > > > > > > >>growing their own food or paying farmers to grow in a
> manner
> > > > > consistent
> > > > > > > >>with "vegan ethics" -- but they choose instead to operate
> > > under
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > >>delusion that their diet is cruelty-free merely because
> they
> > > > > don't eat
> > > > > > > >>meat. Their consumption is as slothful as your abhorrent
> > > attempts
> > > > > to use
> > > > > > > >>logic, Ron.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Which vegan killed what animal
> > > > >
> > > > > It doesn't matter. Their behavior rewards the farmer for
> producing
> > > > > food in a way that is lethal to animals. That's all you need
> to
> > > know.
> > > >
> > > > You are ignoring the question.
> > >
> > > Right: because it isn't a serious question. It's a weak attempt
> at
> > > sophistry.
> > >
> > > > Which vegan killed what animal.
> > >
> > > See above.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > The dead animals are not individually assignable to people, but
> > > then,
> > > > > you already knew that; your question was not a serious
> question,
> > > merely
> > > > > sophistry.
> > > >
> > > > So then, we have dead animals with no identifiable killers
> > >
> > > No. Once again, you have deliberately misrepresented what was
> written,
> > > because you imagine yourself to be clever. Try again.
> >
> > Further editing and avoidance of the question.
> The question is illegitimate, and posed in bad faith.

The question remains, which vegan killed what animal?

To see the humbling of such "great minds".