Ron wrote:
> In article .com>,
> "Jay Santos" > wrote:
>
> > anal leakage wrote:
> > > In article
. com>,
> > > "Jay Santos" > wrote:
> > >
> > > > dribbling homo wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > .com>,
> > > > > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As usual, no substance. The pattern is clear. Whenever
you
> > are proved
> > > > > > wrong, your ego won't let you do either of the two correct
> > responses -
> > > > > > admit your error, or say nothing. Instead, you are driven
to
> > make a
> > > > > > substance-free snarky response.
> > > > >
> > > > > Which vegan killed what animal
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't matter.
> > >
> > > I think it does matter.
> >
> > It doesn't, I don't even think you believe it does; you're just
taking
> > a shit.
> >
> > > Which vegan killed what animal?
> >
> > It doesn't matter.
>
> I notice your objection to

You notice my refusal to let you waste my time on your terms. I may
waste some time on you, but it will always be on my terms, you impotent
self-loathing little homo.

How's your HIV doing?

>
> > > > > > The fact remains that your belief about what is
"consistent"
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > > thinking of a child is wrong, and a stupid thing for anyone
to
> > > > believe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Where is that substantive argument that you keep insisting I
> > never make
> > > >
> > > > Reread that. What a moron you are. If you never make it, it
> > doesn't
> > > > exist, so I can't know where "it" is, because "it isn't".
> > >
> > > More of that dishonest editing.
> > No, no editing at all. You wrote an absurd piece of nonsense.