In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Derek" > wrote
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:13:15 -0500, Ron > wrote:
> > >In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
> > [..]
> > >> It's not "one vague instance", it's a fundamental principle of law,
> > >> morality, and logic.
> > >
> > >Really. Do tell. I have a passing interest in law. I would appreciate
> > >what legal mind has declared this as a fundamental principle in law.
> >
> > Dutch claims to have been a police officer, so the "legal mind"
> > behind this fundamental principle is his own, no doubt.
> >
> > "In my life I was many things, a farmer, a police officer, and
> > a vegetarian, among other things."
> > Dutch 29 Jun 2004 http://tinyurl.com/3kbsb
>
> That's irrelevant, everyone knows that accomplices and accessories to crimes
> are thereby also guilty of crimes.

Of course, it was practiced in anciety Egypt as well. It is a common
principle of Aboriginals and Native Americans. Using the current legal
code of a few nations as measure of absolute morality, Dutch.

As I've been stating, Dutch, using the legal system to support a
circular argument of that which is moral is quite problematic.