"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote
>>
>> > The question was who taught you that you or I was responsible for the
>> > outcomes of other people's actions.
>>
>> It's called complicity. In legal jargon it's "accessory".
>
> Using cultural, or national laws really undermines your argument. Many
> of the acts that are illegal (and therefore immoral) are legal elsewhere
> and therefore moral.

Morality doesn't matter to the principle. If you aid, abet or encourage a
person to commit an act of mercy you have complicity in that act as well.

You really are hopelessly lost trying to win an argument with me on these
subjects, I understand them far better than you ever will.