In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote
> > "Dutch" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Ron" > wrote
> >>
> >> > The question was who taught you that you or I was responsible for the
> >> > outcomes of other people's actions.
> >>
> >> It's called complicity. In legal jargon it's "accessory".
> >
> > And again, you avoided the question.
> >
> > Who taught the pharoahs that they were responsible for the outcomes of
> > other people's actions?
>
> Assuming that you're talking about actions in which you have aideding or
> abeted, since it's common sense, their fathers and mothers probably.

As I stated previously, it is consistent with the thinking of a child to
think that one is responsible for the outcome of other people's actions.
It is what many of us are taught as children. As adults, however, we
recognize the accountability and responsibility of the individual for
their own actions.

> > Who taught the indigenous populations of Africa
> > or Australia that they were responsible for the outcomes of other
> > people's actions?
>
> See above
>
> Read http://law.anu.edu.au/criminet/tcmplicty.html

This is further evidence of the problem of such thinking. An accomplice
to murder is not the murderer. An accomplice to theft is not the thief.