"Ron" > wrote
> "Dutch" > wrote:

>> > Hmm. So it is subjectively wrong (ie. relative to time and location) or
>> > absolutely wrong (universal through time and space) to be an accomplice
>> > or accessory.
>>
>> It depends on the nature of the act to which you are an accomplice and
>> the
>> nature of the complicity. Every case requires a moral and/or legal
>> evaluation.
>
> Buying pot for glaucoma treatment and buying pot for selling to
> teenagers is the SAME act. Please describe the differences in the
> *actions* to warrant different moral or legal responses.

One relieves the symptoms of a disease, the other condemns young people to a
life of menial jobs and unfulfilled potential.

Two actions may be identical in physical form but completely dissimiliar
when the entire circumstances are assessed morally. You must know this or
else you are sociopathic.