In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >, "Dutch" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> "Ron" > wrote
> >> > "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Recoiling and/or defending from threats is
> >> >> instinctive in all organisms.
> >> >
> >> > Who is being threatened and by whom? Sorry, dutch, the paranoia meter
> >> > is
> >> > just going off the scale.
> >> >
> >> > Responding to a real threat is different than responding to an imagine
> >> > threats. (Oops, there's my shadow.)
> >>
> >> Your participation in these discussions is a real threat to your
> >> carefully
> >> groomed terminal stupidity, and you are recoiling from it.
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> Then stop trying so hard.
>
> > Unfortunately, you've failed to respond in the past, so this is
> > unlikely to be different.
>
> Unfortunately you have a habit of asking nonsensical questions.
>
> > What is the likelihood of any of us being murdered versus the likelihood
> > of any specific person being murder with factors that may make such an
> > act more likely to happen?
>
> Absolutely incoherent.
>
> > Imagined and real threats are different for anyone with an ability to
> > reason. One could be murdered, killed in a car wreck and so on, the
> > chances of these events happening though are quite slim for anyone of us.
>
> All righty then...

I was discussing risk assessment -- actual risk versus perceived risk.
You appear to be declining that discussion. I'll move on.