"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote
>> > "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>> >> In your example you created a false impression in that person's mind,
>> >> that's
>> >> all. It has nothing to do with a real immoral act, apart from your
>> >> lying.
>> >> All your demonstration shows is that people can be fooled into
>> >> believing
>> >> something false.
>> >
>> > Believing something false....like moral codes and theories of
>> > complicity.
>>
>> You can't just deceive someone then announce that means moral codes and
>> theories of complicity are false.
>
> Just like the dupe who can be easily deceived and falsely believe
> something where a watch isn't stolen, there are also people who just as
> readily accept the belief that they are responsible for the actions and
> outcomes of others.
Non-sequitor
|