>Dave Smith
>
>>EskWIRED wrote:
>>
>> IMO, the policy shoud be enforced by making those particular registers
>> ring up no more than the stated number of items. So if someone with 20
>> items goes to a 12 or less aisle, the only 12 can be rung up and a total
>> would be required before any more could be rung up.
>>
>> "I'm sorry, but this register only rings up 12 items or less. There's
>> oting I ca do."
>
>Let's face it. Those numbers are arbitrary. Some say 8 items or less, some
>10 items or less, or 12 items or less. There are codes on everything these
>days, and a few extra items is no big deal, just a matter of a few seconds
>extra to pass them over the scanner. There are some things that aren't
>worth fighting over, and even if you are inclined to fight, you have to pick
>your battles. The stores want to come out ahead too.

Why can't yoose pinheads keep yer friggin' eyes on your own plate...

Ever notice how those so concerned with how many items never seem to have their
cash ready to pay, and then the inconsiderate *******s wanna pay by swiping
plastic or even worse, by check... and worst of all, food stamps... unless it's
cash ONLY it ain't express anyway, so who gives a rat's b-hind how many.


---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````