" Bogart " > wrote in message
s.com...
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:28:16 -0600, "Ivan Marsh" >
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:09:17 +0000, Bogart wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 02:02:32 GMT, AH#49 <"AssholeT#49"@ your.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Bogart wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:07:52 -0700, Arri-The tame game only
> >>>> eater-London > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >Because there is no joy in hunting for me. That seems simple enough.
> >>>>
> >>>> Would you hunt if it meant you'd starve to death otherwise?
> >>>
> >>>Arri would only hunt for another delivery boy to send for food. "Have
> >>>acquaintances in both businesses who provided a meal from time to
time."
> >>>
> >>>And being as s/he can do only that, s/he would rather have all
> >>>"personal" hunting and growing denied to everyone else as s/he believes
> >>>that all food MUST come from a brightly lit store with nicely tiled
> >>>floors!
> >>
> >> It's usually the way with the anti-gun crowd. They all think the food
> >> on their table comes from some magical place which doesn't involve
> >> killing and slaughterhouses.
> >
> >Which is done by anal electrocution or a pneumatic pin through the
> >forehead... not with a gun.
>
> Did someone say it was done with a gun?
>
> >...but even if we didn't eat cows we'd still have to kill them all.
>
> Tell that to a Hindu.

I'm intrigued. Why would we still have to kill all the cows?

-*MORT*-