PhotoMan wrote:
>
> "Doug Kanter" > wrote in message
> ...
> > We're going around in circles. If you think it was shady, pretend you're
> the
> > brand manager for Good Humor-Breyers. What would you have done
> differently?
>
> I'd have bitten the bullet and raised the price of the 2 quart package. No
> deceit, nothing hidden. What would be wrong in doing so? More importantly,
> explain why NOT to do it that way.

Indeed, that would be the most clearly ethical thing to do. However, if
one really *were* the brand manager for the corporation which produces
it, I wonder how long one would keep one's job were one to endorse
transparent action like that. Probably not long. This is why I don't
work for a for-profit organization. Not that non-profit is all *that*
much better, but it feels like it.

Priscilla