"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:51:18 GMT, "Lucy"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > You go girl!
>> >
>> > LOL
>> > sf
>> > ``````````````
>>
>> OMG, sf.. you top posted!
>> I'm tellinnnnnnnn MOM!!!
>> lucy
>
> I prefer to read top posters unless everything is on screen.
> Then I don't care if it's top or bottom posting.
>
> Unlike the complainers, I can tell who posted what according
> to the >s on the side (if the snippers have snipped
> carefully). I HATE rereading previous posts just to get to
> the new stuff and that's what bottom posting makes us do.
>
> sf

Well, (duh), if you are clever enough to identify previous posts by the >s,
you do not have to read them. Sheesh!

A: Because it puts the answer before the question.
Q. Why shouldn't I reply at the top?



--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.