"sf" > wrote in message
...
> That's a pompous AND stupid reply. You aren't new to this
> thread, so you know who posted and what they said. You
> certainly didn't need the context of previous post quotes to
> reply to me.
>
> IF you were new to the thread, you would be very welcome to
> scroll down and read the past quotes OR research the thread
> via Google.... so IF you care THAT much about context (which
> is something most people don't need to reply to most threads
> in a ng like rfc), you can read the text quoted below or
> Google the thread.
>
> ````````````````````````````````
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:53:50 GMT, "Peter Aitken"
> > wrote:
>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> >
>> > I prefer to read top posters unless everything is on screen.
>> > Then I don't care if it's top or bottom posting.
>> >
>> > Unlike the complainers, I can tell who posted what according
>> > to the >s on the side (if the snippers have snipped
>> > carefully). I HATE rereading previous posts just to get to
>> > the new stuff and that's what bottom posting makes us do.
>> >
>> > sf
>>
>> Well, (duh), if you are clever enough to identify previous posts by the
>> >s,
>> you do not have to read them. Sheesh!
>>
>> A: Because it puts the answer before the question.
>> Q. Why shouldn't I reply at the top?
>
>
> sf
sf is takin names and kickin ass!
lol
lucy