On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 04:27:48 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
<gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@eart hlink.net>
wrote:

> > > It's basic good sense, not rocket science...amazing how few folx realize
> > > this.
> >
> > OK, Gregory -- I've seen it twice from you and I just gotta let you know
> > I noticed -- folx? How precious! "-)
>
>
> It's one of my nouvelle - vague Usenet "expressions"...and the spelling
> *does* make some kind of sense, no...???

It makes complete sense... because phonetically x = ks
>
> Others a
>
> "hampster" for "hamster
>
> "sleezy" for "sleazy"
>
> "wierd" for "weird"

All of the above are just poor spelling, nothing more.
>
> "Brab" for "Barb" (she's a regular on *chi.general, it's a term of
> endearment for her), etc....

Sorta, maybe, I hope you're right.

sf