sf wrote:

> On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 04:27:48 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
> <gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@eart hlink.net>
> wrote:
>
> > > > It's basic good sense, not rocket science...amazing how few folx
realize
> > > > this.
> > >
> > > OK, Gregory -- I've seen it twice from you and I just gotta let you
know
> > > I noticed -- folx? How precious! "-)
> >
> >
> > It's one of my nouvelle - vague Usenet "expressions"...and the spelling
> > *does* make some kind of sense, no...???
>
> It makes complete sense... because phonetically x = ks
> >
> > Others a
> >
> > "hampster" for "hamster
> >
> > "sleezy" for "sleazy"
> >
> > "wierd" for "weird"
>
> All of the above are just poor spelling, nothing more.



'Tis true...



> > "Brab" for "Barb" (she's a regular on *chi.general, it's a term of
> > endearment for her), etc....
>
> Sorta, maybe, I hope you're right.


I am... ;-)

--
Best
Greg