ravinwulf wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:00:32 GMT, "Rick & Cyndi"
> > wrote:
>
>>I think I read through one of the postings that had "Chung" in the
>>subject... it didn't appear of interest to me so I ignored it. <shrug> I
>>guess I missed something.
>>
>>What's all the uproar about? If anyone didn't want to read about "Chung"
>>why didn't they just ignore the postings?
>
> Yes, we could just ignore the postings; but why should we have to do
> that?

For the same reason that you ignore advertising. And mail you didn't
request. And panhandlers. And traffic. And the whining of people like you.

> "Dr." Chung is a troll, plain and simple, who started cross
> posting here thanks, IIRC, to Mr. Pasterino.

Dear sludgewit ravinwulf:
If Chung crossposted here first, how could it be "thanks to Mr.
Pasterino?" Very clear thinking there...

Chung is a great deal more and a great deal less than "a troll, plain
and simple." Were you able to get beyond your simplistic and simpleton
understandings, you might grasp that.

> Mr. Pasterino continues
> to x-post his flames and post new OT threads flaming this net kook,
> despite being asked by numerous people to stop. It makes the newsgroup
> harder for others to enjoy and it's completely pointless to boot.

It's such a desperate and lofty burden to *not* read some posts. I
know how hard it is...

> Don't you think that's just a little rude on his part?

That's correctly spelled "P-a-s-t-o-r-i-o." Pastorio.

And I always remember to put the seat back down.

Pastorio