On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:04:17 -0500, "Bob (this one)" >
wrote:

>ravinwulf wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:00:32 GMT, "Rick & Cyndi"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>I think I read through one of the postings that had "Chung" in the
>>>subject... it didn't appear of interest to me so I ignored it. <shrug> I
>>>guess I missed something.
>>>
>>>What's all the uproar about? If anyone didn't want to read about "Chung"
>>>why didn't they just ignore the postings?
>>
>> Yes, we could just ignore the postings; but why should we have to do
>> that?
>
>For the same reason that you ignore advertising. And mail you didn't
>request. And panhandlers. And traffic. And the whining of people like you.

Oh, so it's your God given right to be a rude jackass. By your own
admission, you're basically just Usenet's version of a telemarketer.
Gotcha, now I know exactly how to deal with you.

>> "Dr." Chung is a troll, plain and simple, who started cross
>> posting here thanks, IIRC, to Mr. Pasterino.
>
>Dear sludgewit ravinwulf:
>If Chung crossposted here first, how could it be "thanks to Mr.
>Pasterino?" Very clear thinking there...

He cross posted here while chasing after you because you're too stupid
to ignore a troll. You brought him to RFC. Nice try though.

>Chung is a great deal more and a great deal less than "a troll, plain
>and simple." Were you able to get beyond your simplistic and simpleton
>understandings, you might grasp that.

No, he's not.

>> Mr. Pasterino continues
>> to x-post his flames and post new OT threads flaming this net kook,
>> despite being asked by numerous people to stop. It makes the newsgroup
>> harder for others to enjoy and it's completely pointless to boot.
>
>It's such a desperate and lofty burden to *not* read some posts. I
>know how hard it is...

The more kill filters you add to your news reader, the slower it
processes the headers. Idiot. But no fear, you will not bother me any
more.

Regards,
Tracy R.