Paul M. Cook©® > writes

>> >Well not entirely, no. Basic animal husbandry practices for centuries,
>> >including the ME and Europe did not include cannibalizing animals.
>>
>> See pigs and swill, above ....
>> Or do you think people with household pigsty's didn't actually eat their
>> pigs?
>
>Boy you're a stubborn knob. I said husbandry practices and you imply some
>sort of international law. I suppose some of the farmers bred animals from
>the same parents too. What does that prove? Some were too stupid to follow
>the wisdom of the day?

Outside rather recent times most of the pigs would have been housepigs
fed on swill. That was the husbandry practice of the times, everyone
would have done it.

>> >Now if
>> >some of them did so on their own, not much you could do to stop it. A
>> >chicken eating another chicken is not husbandry practices.
>>
>> I suspect the chicken rearers would disagree.
>
>Well chickens don't read, that's true.

Nor would most of the farmers in days past.
Or most of the population, come to that.

--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.
DEMON address no longer in use.