"Lena B Katz" > wrote in message
...

>> Nice attempt to dodge the issue, Lena, but you're talking about two
>> different things. Your being hunted cannot be proved or disproved.
>
> Of course you could disprove it. You could have been there, and seen that
> there was no one there. OTOH, you could "prove" it by having been there,
> and seeing what was going on.
>
>> You'll
>> admit that it could very easily have been a matter of your perception of
>> the
>> situation.
>
> No, I won't. When you see people converging on a point that happens to be
> _you_, and modifying their positions to surround _you_, as you change
> direction, and continue moving towards your home, that's known as a bad
> sign. When you see evidence that you could not have entered your front
> door (because of a sophisticated set of machinery)... that clinches it.
> Coordinated attack.
>
> I'm not just going on my own say-so here... I was with someone at the
> time, who remembers all the facts.
>
> Lena
>

None of what you have said in any was addresses the issue of the mortar
attack. There is NO WAY you could have been the only person who noticed it.
If it happened, there would've been explosive forensics experts all over the
scene, determining the exact cause. You may have heard that Washington DC is
special in certain ways, and that unexplained bombings might raise a few
eyebrows.

Please show further information from a reputable source which indicates that
there was a mortar attack in DC, not counting anything that might have
occurred during the Civil War.