In article >, SteveR
> wrote:
> I'm looking for suggestions for the breakfast and dinner meals -
> something healthy, but something that "regular folks" might eat if they
> were trying to eat healthily rather than what nutritionists would
> suggest.
Why do you think there is a difference between what "regular folks"
might eat vs a nutritionist's suggestion?
Here are some breakfast ideas that "regular folks" eat:
Toasted English muffin (whole grain) with peanut butter
An orange
A glass of milk
McDonald's fruit and yogurt parfait
Coffee or tea
Cheerios with milk
Buttered raisin toast
Banana
A bagel with cream cheese
Fresh Fruit - maybe kiwi or strawberries?
Milk
Which are what "regular folks" might eat and which are "a nutritionist's
suggestion"?
spoiler space
All four breakfasts are from a booklet from a dietitian -- I left out
the portion sizes to make them look more "regular" than they do.
How about dinner?
Chicken breast
mashed potatoes
steamed asparagus spears
green salad with tomato and dressing
fruit
milk
That's a nutritionist-suggested meal, too. The chicken is a 3-oz
portion, the potatoes are a half cup measure and the asparagus is 10
spears. Four fresh apricots for fruit, and skim milk. Dressing is fat
free. Eminently edible.
Pork chop
Barley
coleslaw
Green beans
Milk
Apple Crisp
Also a nutritionist-recommended meal. Also quite edible, not to mention
a lot of foods to put away.
I'd enjoy any of those meals, and I'm about as "regular" (shut up,
Sheldon!) as they come.
--
-Barb, <www.jamlady.eboard.com> Arizona vacation pics added 3-24-05.
"I read recipes the way I read science fiction: I get to the end and
say,'Well, that's not going to happen.'" - Comedian Rita Rudner,
performance at New York, New York, January 10, 2005.
|