In article >,
sf > wrote:
> On 6 Apr 2005 07:28:22 +0200, Wayne Boatwright
> > wrote:
>
> > sf, this is not meant in any way to be an admonishment or overly critical,
> > but most accepted Usenet faqs recommend that the length of sigs be limited
> > to
> > 4 lines. Your new sig seems to come in somewhere around 15-16 lines (with
> > wordwrap), which does seem to be a bit excessive. It's particularly
> > noticable when the post itself is considerably shorter.
> >
> > Regards...
>
>
> Thanks, Wayne. I'm not a fan of big sigs. It isn't my style, but I'm
> in a certain "mood" right now. I plan to delete it soon.... but not
> tonight.
>
> Aside: I find it interesting that my sig line wrapped in another group
> but not in this one. Weird.
>
> data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68dd/e68ddc8ac511f8bf72cf18574fec7aa4b5673560" alt="Smile"
>
Anything to do with the assinine gas prices perchance? <G>
--
K.