Charles Gifford wrote:
> "JimLane" > wrote in message
> ...
> <snip>
>
>>In case it went over your head, I was originally talking to Gifford when
>>P. dove in, not the other way around.
>>
>>
>>jim
>
>
> Your attributions were poorly done Jim, but I certainly knew that you first
> addressed your remarks to me. I did not answer your post because it did not
> seem to require any comment from me. Bob responded very well to your post.
> Even if I felt your remarks merited comment, there was no need to as Bob
> covered them well.
>
> Charlie
>
>


Does not change the fact that I did not start the problem with P., he did.


jim