Katra wrote:
> In article >,
> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
>
>
>>Jack Masters wrote:
>>
>>>Katra wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article >,
>>>> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>storm clouds wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> wrote:
>>>>>>String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nope, frayed knot.
>>>>>
>>>>>String theory?
>>>>>
>>>>>Gee.
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, if you must...
>>>>>
>>>>>Pastorio
>>>>
>>>>I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
>>>
>>>Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42
>>
>>Let's back up a bit here and look at something obviously too subtle for
>>people suffering from cooking fumes. Pay careful attention. This'll be
>>on the final. The post to which I replied was a straight ahead, clever
>>wordplay "frayed knot."
>>
>>Right below that, continuing wordplay, but into a different direction,
>>it says "string theory." Next line says "Gee."
>>
>>If you shuffle them together, you get something else. And it could be
>>42, depending on what sizing system you use.
>>
>><clap, clap> work with me here, people...
>>
>>Pastorio
>
>
> I caught the "frayed knot" but was knot sure what to do with it...
>
> unless you were hoping that the gee string was frayed?
>
> <snicker>
>
> A size 42 gee string might not be that appealing?
> 'twould be quite chaotic.

Who said it was the size of the gee string?