Glitter Ninja wrote:

> "Bob (this one)" > writes:
>
>>Chris McGonnell wrote:
>
>>>Did your imaginary veterinarian dip you for mange or just take the
>>>hook outta your mouth? And which fin did it use? I'm betting on
>>>dorsal.
>
>>Sweet Jesus, you guys are bad at this. No wit. No clever repartee. It
>>seems that any response will do; no concerns with anything beyond
>>quantity. No wonder you try to tag-team it.
>
> Tag team what? We have a cleverly devised schedule maintained for
> optimal annoyance. I see it's working well.

<LOL> Sure it is. Try something new for a change, instead of these tired
self-congratulations. See what's actually transpiring (I'll wait) and
react to it instead of doing this circle-jerk kid stuff.

>>So any reply, even one that shreds your trivial posturing, is a victory
>>for you?
>
> Heh.

Yeah,. I know how it is. Ya get skunked and there's really nothing to say...

>>Here's a brilliant example - another post between two other sterling
>>gangbang wordsmiths:
>>-----------
>>On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:26:16 -0400, "Otto Bahn"
>>
>>>>"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote:
>
> OK, that's enough. Please do not use "Otto", "Kevin", and "gangbang"
> in the same sentence.

My dearest Stacia, it would appear that they do actually belong in the
same sentence and I appreciate your doing that.

Collect your usual fee. It's on the dresser.

Pastorio