"kilikini" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jack Schidt®" > wrote in message
> . ..
> > Film records effects of eating only McDonald's for a month
> >
> > 25.01.2004 12.00pm - By DAVID USBORNE
> > NEW YORK - Normally sane actors have been known to gain or lose huge
> amounts
> > of weight for their art. Think of Renee Zellweger in Bridget Jones's
> Diary.
> > Directors, of course, never have to undergo such torture. Or so it used
to
> > be, until Morgan Spurlock had a bright idea for a film project.
> >
> > The first clue to his particular misery comes in the title of his
> > documentary, which has become the darling of this year's Sundance Film
> > Festival. It is called Super Size Me: A Film of Epic Portions and it is
a
> > sometimes comic but serious look at America's addiction to fast food.
> >
> >
>
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainm...lay.cfm?storyI
>
D=3545438&thesection=entertainment&thesubsection=f ilm&thesecondsubsection=ge
> neral
> >
> > Jack Mac
> >
>
> Wow, great article, Jack. Now if someone could be brave enough to try
let's
> say, Jack In The Box, for 30 days, then try McDonald's for 30 days (after
> cleaning out the system), then try KFC for 30 days, we could figure out
> which fast food restaurant was worse. Not that anyone would do it, nor am
I
> endorsing the idea, I'm just thinking one step further than Mr. Spurlock.
> Could anyone survive that?
>
> kilikini
>

Well, the "safer" (using the term *very* lightly) way would be to have three
people in roughly the same physical shape do the different restaurants for
30 days. Monitor their health the entire time and see who's in the worse
shape in the end.
I think, also, there would have to be some tracking of their choices for the
most accurate results. After all, someone who goes to McD's every day and
eats salad for say, 2 of the three meals, would be alot different than
someone at Jack in The Box eating sourdough bacon burgers every day.
Still and all, I wouldn't do it on a bet.

kimberly