"The Wolf" > wrote in message
...
> On 01/29/2004 11:48 PM, in article
> , "Melissa Houle"
> > opined:
>
> I am sick and ****ing tired of all you "they're picking on her because
she's
> famous" crybabies. SHE IS IN FEDERAL COURT BECAUSE SHE LIED TO FEDERAL
> PROSCUTORS AND HER STOCK HOLDERS!
I feel the same way about Rush Limbaugh. He is under the thumb of the
prosecutor in Palm Beach County because he purchased drugs in a Denny's
parking lot with boxes full of cash. He illegally structured bank
withdrawals to hide the transactions. Then he obtained duplicate
prescriptions from multiple sources simultaneously to feed his addiction.
There are pharmacy and bank records to support this. In addition, his
housekeeper supplied voice recordings and emails to support the claim that
he had her illegally obtain narcotics for him. Now, after bashing the ACLU
and liberal trial attorneys, he hired a liberal trial attorney to defend him
and has not refused the help of the ACLU on his behalf. Any common person
would have been in jail by now, but Rush asserts that he is being unfairly
treated because he is a celebrity. His attorney asserts that there is no
utility in charging him with a crime, however Rush says that more white
people (his term) should be prosecuted and "sent up" for taking illegal
drugs. They claim that there are no victims, but someone had to knock over
a drug store, steal a delivery truck, or break into a warehouse to divert
the "prescription drugs" for sale on the street. The housekeeper was
pressured to do illegal acts. Limbaugh claims to be the highest rated talk
show on radio and is definitely Clear Channel's cash cow. His illegal acts
jeopardize that company's bottom line the same way that Martha's alleged
illegal acts impact her company. The only difference here is that I would
enjoy seeing the Bush puppets, Clear Channel and Rush Limbaugh, suffer and
you would like to see liberal Democrat, Martha Stewart, suffer.