"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Scented Nectar wrote:
> > "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > > "usual suspect" > wrote in message
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > >>Rudy Canoza wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>Scented Nectar wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> > > legroups.com...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>dh@. wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>Goobernicus Gonad--the moron who thinks he's a genius
> > > >>>>>>and enjoys being referred to simply as "Goo"--has proven
> > > >>>>>>himself an incredible coward. He has done that by cowardly
> > > >>>>>>declining to answer questions and perform things which he
> > > >>>>>>has boasted of being able to do. Some of the things he is
> > > >>>>>>afraid to even attempt include:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>1. explaining exactly which emotions animals can and
> > > >>>>>> can not experience
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>2. explaining how anything could have inherent rights
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>3. providing any opposition at all to "AR"
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>4. explaining why nothing has ever benefitted from living
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>5. explaining why we should only consider killing but not life
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>6. explaining what or whom--other than those who are
> > > >>>>>> disturbed by the fact that humans eat meat--would benefit
> > > >>>>>> from their elimination objective
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>7. describe any emotion(s) through language
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>8. explaining any way(s) in which people could contribute to
> > > >>>>>> better lives for food animals.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>9. explaining why one emotion is more difficult to experience
> > > >>>>>> than another.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>10. explaining how any difference between the ability of humans
and
> > > >>>>>> other animals to experience emotions, is a moral issue.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>11. explaining the qualitative differences between anger and
> > > >>>>>> disappointment, if there are any.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>12. demonstrating an ethically equivalent or superior
alternative
> > > >>>>>> to the elimination of domestic animals.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>13. explaining what it is that makes animals appear to be
> > > >
> > > > experiencing
> > > >
> > > >>>>>> certain emotions, under conditions which could easily
trigger
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>those
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>> particular emotions, if it is not those particular
emotions.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>14. explaining how any emotions could be dependant on language.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>15. explaining the kind of stimulus-response "anticipation" you
can
> > > >
> > > > get
> > > >
> > > >>>>>> from a dog
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Yes, he most surely is my goober, as we proved again and
again
> > > >>>>>>and again.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>He's your own personal "Goobernicus Goober".
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>LOL!!!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>He's Gooby Goo, a dissappointed
> > > >>>>cartoon dog. )
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>You're Skanky the ****, the 42 year old, unmarried, childless,
> > > >>>degreeless, scut-working marginal.
> > > >>
> > > >>...who takes the bus because she has no car.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your need to fish is pathetic.
> > >
> > > Not fishing. You've already admitted you take the bus. Your
sanctimony,
> > > with all your tap-dancing between "killing animals is wrong" and "I
> > > can't be bothered to practice what I preach," is much more pathetic
than
> > > anything which you can ever accuse anyone else.
> >
> > Wow, have you ever gotten things
> > ****ed up there.
>
> He didn't get anything ****ed up.

Yes he did.

> > You used "quotes" in the above
> > making it sound like my words.
> > You know full well that I think
> > killing animals is *mostly* wrong.
>
> No. You can't. You can't leap 20 feet into the air, you can't lift
> 100 kg of weight over your head, and you can't think it's "mostly"
> wrong to kill animals. It is impossible. If you insist you to think
> it, then you are admitting to mental illness.

I CAN believe it's mostly wrong
to kill animals, and no, that's not
a mental disorder. Your
obsessive-compulsive needs
to make things into absolutes
though are mental. Also, your
paranoid seeing of 'implied'
things all over the place might
be suspect as well.

> > You also know full well that I do
> > believe that I practice what I
> > preach.
>
> It doesn't matter if you "believe" that you practice what you preach.
> Your beliefs are irrelvant. It is objectively true that you do *not*
> practice what you preach. We also note that you claim to believe it is
> "mostly" wrong to kill animals, and that belief is impossible for a
> rational and thinking person to hold. Your statements of what you
> believe you think and do are wholly immaterial.

My beliefs are very relevant as
to whether I think I'm living up
to them. When you say "We
also...", who else are you
referring to, specifically?


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/