On 01/30/2004 12:56 PM, in article
, "Vox Humana"
> opined:

>
> "The Wolf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 01/30/2004 9:23 AM, in article
> ,
>> "Vox Humana" > opined:
>>
>>>
>>> "Naomi Darvell" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm enjoying the fact that Rush appears to be a hypocrite about this--
> but
>>> I'm
>>>> enjoying it all the more because the ACLU is taking the high road. I
> think
>>>> everyone should. The point will not be lost.
>>>
>>> I'm afraid that it will be lost it the vast right-wing spin cycle.
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> " We went to war because of WMD. There are no WMD.
>>
>> What did he use on the Kurds Einstein?
>
> He used WMD, probably supplied by the Reagan and Bush administrations. He
> used them at a time when Rumsfield was touting him as a nice guy.
>
> The key word here is HAD.


Where'd they go Einstein? Did they just vanish into thin air?



That's past tense. HAD does not mean HAVE. See
> the difference? Had we invaded the country in 1988 because he had WMD then
> we would have been right. Unfortunately,in 1988 we were supporting Iraq
> because they were the enemy of our enemy, Iran, assuming that meant Iraq was
> our friend. We also supported the Taliban because they were the enemy of
> our enemy, the Soviet Union.
>
>

--
================================================== ========================
"If George W. Bush announced that a cure for cancer had been discovered,
Democrats would complain about unemployed laboratory rats," Ann Coulter.
================================================== ========================